Skip to sources
Time Machine

Transportation Security Screeners

Scrub through 63years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
19752000now
2026
Known today as Transportation Security Officer / Transportation Security Screener (BLS SOC 33-9093)
Latest actual · 2024
46K
OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.
Latest actual · 2024
$63,360
Source: BLS-OEWS
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Walk-through magnetometer and X-ray conveyor (FAA mandate, January 5, 1973)

    The FAA's January 1973 universal screening mandate created the occupation. Every commercial passenger had to walk through a magnetometer; every carry-on bag had to pass through an X-ray machine monitored by a screener. The technology had been developed in the late 1960s: George Shepherd and Neil Diepeveen at Philips built and demonstrated the first airport X-ray conveyor at Washington National Airport in September 1970, and walk-through magnetometers from Infinetics had been tested by FAA evaluators since 1968. The physical act of watching grayscale X-ray images on a monitor and reading passengers as they walked through a metal detector defined the entire job for the first three decades of its existence.

    Effect on the work

    Created the occupation from scratch. Before January 1973 there was no organized profession of airport security screener; after it there was a workforce of tens of thousands employed by airline-contracted private security firms at every major U.S. airport. Turnover under the private-contractor model ran at over 100 percent annually at major airports by the late 1990s, an index of how poorly the work was valued.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Explosives-trace detection and Pan Am 103 aftermath (FAA 1988 reforms)

    The bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, on December 21, 1988, killed 270 people and exposed the inadequacy of the existing checkpoint model. A bomb had been placed in checked baggage, not carry-on. Congress responded with the Aviation Security Improvement Act of 1990, which required FAA-approved explosive-detection systems for checked baggage at high-risk airports and expanded screener training requirements. Chemical trace-detection wands and explosive-trace-detection (ETD) portals entered screener workflows during the 1990s, adding a second layer of physical inspection to the job and requiring new skill in reading chemical-detection readouts. The FAA also launched its Explosives Detection Canine Team Program in 1972 after a bomb-sniffing dog located a device on a TWA flight; this expanded through the 1990s as a supplementary detection layer.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Federalization and post-9/11 checkpoint expansion (ATSA, November 19, 2001)

    The Aviation and Transportation Security Act, signed November 19, 2001, abolished the private-contractor model and created a federal workforce of Transportation Security Officers under a new agency, the Transportation Security Administration. Every screener now had to be a U.S. citizen, pass a criminal background check, and complete federal training. TSA deployed to all commercial airports by the ATSA deadline of November 19, 2002, one year to the day from the law's signing. In 2003 TSA moved from the Department of Transportation into the newly created Department of Homeland Security. Screeners' tools were now federal government property: standardized walk-through magnetometers, X-ray machines, and trace-detection equipment, managed under TSA procurement rather than airline contracts. Shoe removal became a standard checkpoint step in 2006, following the 2001 shoe-bomb attempt by Richard Reid, adding a new procedural element to every screening lane.

    Effect on the work

    Headcount expanded from approximately 28,000 private-sector screeners in September 2001 to 55,000 federal screeners by November 2002, a near-doubling in twelve months. Pay roughly tripled from private-sector levels of approximately $10,000 per year to a federal starting range of $23,600 to $35,400 under the ATSA mandate.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT): backscatter X-ray then millimeter-wave scanners

    TSA began deploying Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) body scanners in 2007, initially testing X-ray backscatter units manufactured by Rapiscan in the secondary screening position before expanding to primary screening. Millimeter-wave scanners, which use non-ionizing radio-frequency energy, were deployed alongside backscatter units from 2008. AIT shifted a key screener task from a hands-on pat-down to a remote image review: a separate screener in a remote viewing room read the body image (which at that time showed anatomical detail), then communicated alarm locations to the floor officer. Public and congressional objections to the anatomical imaging and health concerns about ionizing radiation from backscatter units eventually led Congress to mandate Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) software that displayed a generic human outline rather than an individual's body image. When Rapiscan failed to meet the ATR deadline by June 2013, all 250 backscatter units were removed from U.S. airports. Millimeter-wave scanners with ATR became the sole AIT technology at U.S. checkpoints from 2013 onward.

    Effect on the work

    AIT did not reduce screener headcount, but it changed how screeners were deployed: the image-reviewer role was a new function created by the technology, requiring a screener positioned away from the lane. The shift also reduced the frequency of full-contact pat-downs for passengers who cleared AIT, though an alarm on the generic ATR figure still required a targeted physical inspection.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • TSA PreCheck and trusted-traveler risk-based screening (pilot October 2011, public program December 2013)

    TSA PreCheck launched as a pilot in October 2011 and opened to general public enrollment in December 2013. Enrolled travelers pass through dedicated lanes where they keep shoes, belts, and jackets on, leave laptops in bags, and do not receive AIT body screening. By 2024, TSA PreCheck had surpassed 20 million active members and accounted for a growing share of checkpoint throughput. For screeners, PreCheck created a lane bifurcation that changed the texture of the job: standard lanes concentrate the more complex, higher-contact screening interactions while PreCheck lanes are faster and lower-intervention. Screeners rotate between lane types. The program also created new career adjacencies in trusted-traveler program management and risk-based intelligence integration.

    AI audit toolsPattern detection
  • CT scanners, credential-authentication technology, and AI-assisted threat recognition (2020s checkpoint modernization)

    TSA's 2020s technology modernization program deploys computed tomography (CT) scanners at carry-on checkpoints, which produce three-dimensional images that screeners can rotate and manipulate, replacing the flat two-dimensional X-ray image that has defined the job since 1973. CT units allow laptops and liquids to remain in bags at equipped checkpoints, reducing the manual reorganization step. Credential Authentication Technology (CAT) readers verify identification documents and passenger reservation data automatically, replacing the manual ID-document inspection that screeners previously performed. Facial-comparison technology integrated into CAT-2 readers (deployed from 2022) matches the traveler's face to their ID photo without requiring the screener to make a visual judgment. Artificial-intelligence assisted threat-recognition software is being integrated into the CT image stream to flag potential threats automatically, with the screener reviewing flagged items. Together these tools shift the screener role toward system supervision and exception handling rather than primary visual inspection.

    Work toolChanging equipment
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
-6%
BLS Employment Projections national matrix projects a decline of 3,000 positions (from 50,100 to 47,100) for SOC 33-9093 between 2024 and 2034, a 6 percent reduction. The BLS methodology uses an industry-occupation matrix combined with labor-productivity assumptions. For screeners, the headcount projection reflects continued growth in TSA PreCheck and Global Entry membership, which reduces the average time and staffing intensity required per passenger screened. Offsetting factors include continued growth in total air passenger volume, which keeps underlying demand for screener hours relatively stable. The projection does not model a full return to the pre-2001 private-contractor model or the elimination of TSA, which would represent a structural policy change outside the BLS modeling scope.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. "GPTs are GPTs" (2023)
2028
12%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-level LLM-exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for Protective Service occupations. Transportation security screeners score in the low-to-medium range for LLM exposure because the dominant tasks require physical presence and real-time sensorimotor judgment: operating X-ray machines, physically inspecting bags, conducting pat-downs, and reading human behavior at a checkpoint. The modest exposure estimate of approximately 12 percent reflects the administrative and communication tasks (filing incident reports, explaining screening procedures) that LLMs could assist with, offset by the large share of tasks that require physical co-presence. The growing integration of AI-assisted threat-recognition software into CT image streams represents the most significant AI vector for the occupation, but the current design keeps a human screener in the review loop for all flagged items.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you hereInspect carry-on items, using x-ray viewing equipment, to determine whether items contain objects that warrant further investigation.

Inspect carry-on items, using x-ray viewing equipment, to determine whether items contain objects that warrant further investigation.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you hereSearch carry-on or checked baggage by hand when it is suspected to contain prohibited items such as weapons.

Search carry-on or checked baggage by hand when it is suspected to contain prohibited items such as weapons.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you hereCheck passengers' tickets to ensure that they are valid, and to determine whether passengers have designations that require special handling, such as providing photo identification.

Check passengers' tickets to ensure that they are valid, and to determine whether passengers have designations that require special handling, such as providing photo identification.[2]

Where your edge is

Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Protective Services · see all 14roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1973
Latest tracked employment46,340 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$63,360 (2024)
Outlook-6% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 17 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
200128,000$10,000ESTIMATE
200255,000$29,500ESTIMATE
201042,430$37,070BLS-OEWS
201145,320$36,910BLS-OEWS
201247,200$36,850BLS-OEWS
201345,790$37,090BLS-OEWS
201443,220$38,090BLS-OEWS
201541,820$39,310BLS-OEWS
201642,750$39,680BLS-OEWS
201742,470$40,580BLS-OEWS
201845,250$41,490BLS-OEWS
201946,730$41,770BLS-OEWS
202046,850$44,300BLS-OEWS
202148,320$45,470BLS-OEWS
202247,550$47,710BLS-OEWS
202347,950$50,020BLS-OEWS
202446,340$63,360BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/33-9093"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="Transportation Security Screeners, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Protective Services