Skip to sources
Time Machine

New Accounts Clerks

Scrub through 186years of this role's history, from when it first emerged, through every wave of technology that reshaped it, to the cited projections for where it's heading next.

2026drag to travel through time
1850187519001925195019752000now
2026
Known today as New Accounts Clerks (BLS SOC 43-4141)
Latest actual · 2024
38K
OEWS is a point-in-time survey snapshot, not a continuous time series; BLS advises against using it for year-over-year trend comparison.
Latest actual · 2024
$46,610
Source: BLS-OEWS
Each dot is a cited figure over time; the dotted line only links them (values between aren't measured). Hollow dots are estimates.
Tools of the era

The tools that defined the work

Select an era to see how it reshaped the work.

  • Ledger book and passbook (manuscript account-opening era)

    Before any mechanization, opening a new bank account required the clerk to hand-write the customer's personal information into a bound ledger, assign an account number from a sequential register, issue a handwritten or printed passbook, and record the initial deposit. The passbook was the customer's only record of their balance; banks kept the authoritative ledger. The work was deliberate, error-prone, and labor-intensive: a single clerk could process perhaps fifteen to twenty new account openings per day given the time required to gather identity information, write clearly, and perform arithmetic for interest calculations. The skill set was penmanship, arithmetic, and a memory for bank policy -- not yet sales.

    Ledger workPaper recordkeeping
  • Burroughs and NCR bookkeeping machines (mechanized ledger era)

    The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 standardized banking regulation and accelerated the adoption of mechanized bookkeeping. Burroughs Adding Machine Company and NCR (National Cash Register) both produced specialized banking machines in the 1910s and 1920s that could post transactions to ledger cards mechanically, calculate interest, and print customer statements. By the 1930s, the Burroughs Class 5 and similar machines were standard equipment at US commercial banks. For the new accounts function specifically, the shift from handwritten ledgers to typed ledger cards (later transferred to machine-posted ledger sheets) reduced transcription errors and allowed account records to be centralized in a filing system rather than a bound book. The new accounts clerk of this era needed to be proficient on the bookkeeping machine and on the Addressograph plate system (embossed metal plates used to address statements), skills that required weeks of training and were highly gender-stratified: women dominated the machine room, men dominated supervisory and lending roles.

    Effect on the work

    Mechanized bookkeeping modestly increased the throughput of individual account clerks, but because it also reduced error rates and allowed banks to maintain more accounts reliably, it primarily enabled banking expansion rather than reducing headcount. Employment in banking grew from roughly 150,000 in 1910 to 350,000 by 1940 despite mechanization.

    Ledger workPaper recordkeeping
  • IBM mainframe and magnetic-stripe core banking systems (ERMA era)

    Bank of America, working with Stanford Research Institute, deployed the Electronic Recording Method of Accounting (ERMA) in September 1955, processing checks using magnetic ink character recognition (MICR). The first fully automated bank account system went live in 1959. IBM's 1401 and subsequently the System/360 family powered the core banking platforms that most large US banks adopted through the 1960s. For the new accounts clerk, this era produced the account-opening form: instead of ledger cards, the clerk now filled out a multipart carbon paper form whose data was later keyed into the mainframe by a data-entry operator. The clerk's face-to-face role became a data-gathering exercise with a defined script. The customer ID, employment, references, and initial deposit were captured on a standardized form; the actual account creation happened overnight in the batch-processing cycle. Opening an account still required a branch visit and a human conversation, but the clerk was now a front-end for a machine rather than the complete record-keeping system.

    Effect on the work

    Mainframe core banking systems enabled banks to manage far more accounts per employee than was possible in the manual ledger era, which is a primary reason that teller employment doubled from ~300,000 in 1970 to ~600,000 in 2006 despite the ATM: branches remained cheaper to open and more accounts became manageable. The new accounts function benefited from this expansion.

    Mainframe processingComputerized records
  • ATM networks and real-time branch terminals (transaction-offload era)

    On September 2, 1969, Chemical Bank installed the first ATM in the United States at its branch in Rockville Centre, New York. The bank advertised that it would "open at 9:00 and never close again." The ATM offloaded routine cash withdrawals and balance inquiries from tellers, which paradoxically allowed banks to operate more branches at lower cost -- the classic "ATM paradox" documented by economists James Bessen (2015) and others: more ATMs meant more branches, and more branches meant more bank staff overall, including new accounts clerks. By the late 1980s, real-time branch terminals (replacing the overnight batch model) gave new accounts clerks instant visibility into whether a new customer already held accounts at the bank, their credit status through real-time bureau queries, and a live confirmation that the new account had been created. The account-opening process shifted from "fill out this form and come back in three days for your checks" to "your account is open right now -- here is your temporary check."

    Effect on the work

    The ATM paradox benefited new accounts clerks directly: the US bank branch count grew from approximately 35,000 in 1970 to a peak of approximately 99,500 in 2009. Each new branch required at least one new accounts specialist. The occupation's peak employment (~100,000-120,000 estimated) coincided roughly with the peak branch count around 2008-2009.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Internet banking and online account opening (Wells Fargo 1995; Presidential Bank first online account 1995)

    Wells Fargo became the first US bank to offer account services through a website in 1995. That same year, Presidential Bank became the first institution to open accounts entirely online. These two events mark the beginning of the end of the new accounts clerk as the exclusive gateway to becoming a bank customer. For most of the next decade, online account opening was a niche preference; most people still visited a branch. The 2004 adoption milestone -- 31% of US households banking online -- and the 2009 milestone -- 47% of American adults banking online (Pew Research) -- mark the phase transition during which online account opening shifted from option to default. Banks shuttered approximately 4,000 of their peak 99,500 branches between 2009 and 2015, and new accounts clerk employment began its sustained decline.

    Effect on the work

    Bank branch count peaked at approximately 99,500 in 2009 and declined to approximately 77,000 by 2020. Each closed branch eliminated at least one new accounts position. The employment impact was gradual rather than sudden, because many customers -- especially older customers and those in underserved communities -- continued to prefer branch-based account opening through the mid-2010s.

    Work toolChanging equipment
  • Mobile-first digital onboarding and AI-assisted KYC (current era)

    The contemporary account-opening experience at most major US banks requires no human interaction: a customer opens a Chime, Marcus by Goldman Sachs, or Chase mobile account by photographing their driver's license, answering a few identity-verification questions, and making a small opening deposit via ACH or debit card transfer. Machine-learning Know-Your-Customer (KYC) systems from vendors such as Jumio, Socure, and Onfido perform identity document verification, OFAC screening, and fraud scoring in seconds. The new accounts clerk's core value -- explaining product differences, fielding questions, establishing trust with an anxious first-time depositor -- survives in the branch for complex accounts (small business, trust, estate), for customers with credit challenges, and for older demographics, but this is a smaller and declining portion of all new account openings. The surviving role concentrates increasingly on cross-selling, relationship management, and the human connection that a mobile app cannot provide for high-value customers.

    Effect on the work

    The 2024 BLS OEWS count of 38,900 represents an estimated 60-65% decline from the occupation's estimated peak of approximately 100,000-120,000 in the early 2000s, with the steepest drop occurring between 2010 and 2020 as mobile banking penetration crossed the 50% threshold.

    Work toolChanging equipment
Projection cone · present → 2034

What credible sources project

Scrub the slider past now to anchor each scenario on the scrubber. The spread is the range of futures credible sources project for this role.

Employment outlook
Projected change in the number of people doing this work.
BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34
2034
-13.2%
BLS Employment Projections, 2024-34 cycle. The matrix projects employment for SOC 43-4141 New Accounts Clerks declining from 38.9 thousand in 2024 to approximately 33.8 thousand in 2034, a decline of approximately 5,100 positions (-13.2%). The BLS methodology models continued digital channel expansion -- mobile and online account opening, chatbot-assisted onboarding, and AI-driven KYC verification -- as the primary structural headwinds. The finance and insurance sector, which employs 97% of new accounts clerks, is itself projected to decline slightly in clerical headcount as digital automation extends to more account types. The -13.2% rate is substantially steeper than the all-occupations average projected change of +4%, placing new accounts clerks in the decline category alongside other roles most affected by fintech adoption.
AI task exposure
Share of the role’s tasks that researchers estimate AI can do. This is a measure of task exposure, not a forecast of jobs lost.
Eloundou et al. -- "GPTs are GPTs" (2023)
2028
82%
of tasks
GPT-4 task-by-task LLM exposure labeling on O*NET tasks for Financial Clerks and Information Clerks. New accounts clerks rank among the most highly LLM-exposed occupations in the administrative support major group because their core tasks -- interviewing customers to gather personal and financial information, explaining product features and terms, identifying appropriate accounts for customer needs, and processing application paperwork -- are all information-intensive verbal tasks that a sufficiently capable language model can replicate or assist. The 82% exposure estimate reflects the substantial portion of the role that could be handled via a conversational AI interface (chatbot or voice agent) with access to the bank's account management system. The remaining 18% (identity document verification requiring physical inspection, cash handling, in-person trust establishment with vulnerable customers) resists LLM substitution. Note: "exposure" does not mean immediate displacement; it measures the share of tasks technically addressable by LLM tools, not the pace of adoption.
Frey & Osborne (2013)
2033
70%
of tasks
Gaussian-process classifier on O*NET task features, Oxford Martin School. Frey and Osborne rated financial institution clerks and related information-gathering roles in the high-risk range for computerization, reflecting that the core tasks of the new accounts function (structured information collection, product explanation, paperwork processing) presented few perceived bottlenecks from the manual-dexterity, social perception, and creative intelligence dimensions that F&O identified as automation-resistant. The 70% figure here is an approximation of the F&O risk score for the "financial institution clerks" category, which was not separately enumerated as 43-4141 in the 2013 SOC mapping used by F&O. The actual employment decline since 2013 -- approximately 50-60% from peak, primarily driven by digital account opening rather than AI -- was already well underway when F&O published, and their model reasonably forecast continued pressure on the role.
Today, in this role

What's shifting in the work right now

The historical view above shows how this role has moved. This is the present-day detail: which AI tools are picking up which tasks, where the edge still is, and the natural directions this work can grow.

What's changing in your day

Three parts of your work where AI is already doing real lifting, and what stays yours.

AI is sitting alongside you herePerform teller duties as required.

Perform teller duties as required.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you hereCompile information about new accounts, enter account information into computers, and file related forms or other documents.

Compile information about new accounts, enter account information into computers, and file related forms or other documents.[2]

Where your edge is

AI is sitting alongside you hereCollect and record customer deposits and fees and issue receipts, using computers.

Collect and record customer deposits and fees and issue receipts, using computers.[2]

Where your edge is

Share this year
Drops anyone you send it to straight into 2026.
Preview card
Part of Admin & Office · see all 39roles →
Different role?

See the same long-arc view for your own profession.

Browse the directory by industry, or search by title or SOC code. New roles ship every few weeks. Every profile cites every claim.

Browse all roles

The data behind this timeline

On record since1850
Latest tracked employment38,030 (US, 2024)
Latest median pay$46,610 (2024)
Outlook-13.2% by 2034 (BLS National Employment Matrix 2024-34)
View all 26 cited data points
YearUS employmentMedian annual paySource
195040,000n/aESTIMATE
1960n/a$4,200ESTIMATE
197065,000n/aESTIMATE
1980n/a$10,400ESTIMATE
2003105,300$25,930BLS-OEWS
200496,560$26,860BLS-OEWS
200582,450$27,420BLS-OEWS
200680,770$28,390BLS-OEWS
200788,880$29,610BLS-OEWS
200887,300$30,230BLS-OEWS
200981,650$30,640BLS-OEWS
201067,170$30,440BLS-OEWS
201160,830$31,030BLS-OEWS
201255,320$31,720BLS-OEWS
201356,990$33,190BLS-OEWS
201452,260$34,000BLS-OEWS
201548,970$34,880BLS-OEWS
201641,630$34,990BLS-OEWS
201741,680$35,260BLS-OEWS
201841,500$35,800BLS-OEWS
201943,420$36,550BLS-OEWS
202045,250$37,750BLS-OEWS
202140,500$37,840BLS-OEWS
202245,170$40,820BLS-OEWS
202341,180$44,630BLS-OEWS
202438,030$46,610BLS-OEWS
Embed this timeline on your site

Free for any site. Paste this where the timeline should appear; it stays interactive, every datapoint stays cited, and it sets no cookies on your page. How embedding works

<iframe src="https://futurehistory.earth/embed/43-4141"
  width="100%" height="430" style="border:0"
  title="New Accounts Clerks, a Future History timeline"
  loading="lazy"></iframe>

See all roles in Admin & Office